News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Erjang is a virtual machine for Erlang, which runs on Java by vladev on Friday December 04, 2009 @10:27AM (#976476)
Call me a skeptic, but this project ditches Erlang's awesome VM and takes only the clunky language syntax and puts it on the JVM.

I wonder how things like process isolation will work out.

Re:Erjang is a virtual machine for Erlang, which runs on Java by sriramk on Friday December 04, 2009 @11:37AM (#976615)
You beat me to it. My first reaction was "Wait - how is preserving Erlang's syntax but losing the VM a good thing?". I'd love projects going the other direction - a more modern syntax built on Erlang's rock-solid VM + OTP libraries.
Re:Erjang is a virtual machine for Erlang, which runs on Java by oconnor0 on Friday December 04, 2009 @03:02PM (#977078)
What are the names of some of those projects?
Re:Erjang is a virtual machine for Erlang, which runs on Java by frig8 on Friday December 04, 2009 @03:53PM (#977175)
Re:Erjang is a virtual machine for Erlang, which runs on Java by bad_user on Friday December 04, 2009 @12:16PM (#976711)
I don't see a problem with process isolation ... you can control the bytecode generated from the compiler, and then you make the Java FFI really hard to please.

Since Erlang uses light-weight processes, this is exactly what the Erlang VM is doing.

Re:Erjang is a virtual machine for Erlang, which runs on Java by xtho on Friday December 04, 2009 @01:49PM (#976936)
I'm always skeptic if there is only one actively maintained implementation of a language in use. In this respect, this is per se a good thing.