News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Not OK, Google.

Re:Not OK, Google by thom_nic on Monday June 22, 2015 @11:36AM (#9759025)
Maybe someone should create a privacy-conscious Chromium fork.

Call it Duck-Duck-Chrome

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Not OK, Google by Zikes on Monday June 22, 2015 @11:39AM (#9759054)
Whereas Iceweasel is the "free as in freedom" version of Firefox, perhaps the Chromium fork should be a called Dullium.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Not OK, Google by thrillgore on Monday June 22, 2015 @11:43AM (#9759084)
SRWare Iron. It's still in development.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Not OK, Google by stullig on Monday June 22, 2015 @03:18PM (#9760579)
Yeah, don't use that, shady maintainer: http://www.insanitybit.com/2012/06/23/srware-iron-browser-a-...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Not OK, Google by mikegioia on Monday June 22, 2015 @12:26PM (#9759394)
Instead of SRWare, I would recommend Iridium Browser (https://iridiumbrowser.de).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Not OK, Google by stray on Monday June 22, 2015 @11:44AM (#9759097)
BlackPolishedChrome.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Not OK, Google by higherpurpose on Monday June 22, 2015 @11:50AM (#9759152)
Black Chrome would actually be a pretty good name.
[ Parent | on HN ]