Re:A New Algorithm Reveals the Hidden World of Imperceptible...
by joshu on Sunday June 21, 2015 @02:41PM
(#9754465)
If you realize that a camera is a time-series motion capture sensor, as is a microphone (the position of the diaphragm) then this is actually less relevatory...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A New Algorithm Reveals the Hidden World of Imperceptible...
by teej on Sunday June 21, 2015 @03:35PM
(#9754658)
Honest questions: how many "frames per second" is a standard microphone? What exactly is a "frame" of audio?
Re:A New Algorithm Reveals the Hidden World of Imperceptible...
by WiseWeasel on Sunday June 21, 2015 @04:15PM
(#9754825)
44.1 kHz (CD quality audio) is 44,100 samples per second, though professional recording equipment typically supports up to 96 kHz sample rates.
Note that for the more common analog microphones, the microphone itself doesn't determine the sample rates; it's the digital sampler to which it's connected.
Re:A New Algorithm Reveals the Hidden World of Imperceptible...
by raverbashing on Sunday June 21, 2015 @05:48PM
(#9755135)
"the microphone itself doesn't determine the sample rates"
True, but it has a response curve, and I assume most don't respond as well to >20kHz frequency (or even less)
Re:A New Algorithm Reveals the Hidden World of Imperceptible...
by teej on Sunday June 21, 2015 @04:53PM
(#9754948)
This makes sense, thank you!
Re:A New Algorithm Reveals the Hidden World of Imperceptible...
by StavrosK on Sunday June 21, 2015 @05:37PM
(#9755089)
Keep in mind that, even with 120 fps of video, you can pretty much only reproduce frequencies of up to 60 Hz. I guess they do some more modeling to make the sound more intelligible, though.