News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Albert Woodfox's Forty Years in Solitary Confinement. Parent comment

Re:Albert Woodfox's Forty Years in Solitary Confinement by fineman on Saturday June 20, 2015 @01:34AM (#9749128)
The thing is, the banker (or other white-collar criminal) is the only one who planned it. They, more than the thugs imho, should be locked away because they're predators not just opportunists.

And maybe we could spare the cage... But after we get around to the mistakenly (cough) convicted black people, and poor people, and those with mental illness, etc, then we can worry about the poor-banker in his comfortable minimum-security cell.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Albert Woodfox's Forty Years in Solitary Confinement by nate_meurer on Saturday June 20, 2015 @01:07PM (#9750432)
Well that's a fine point you make -- predators vs. opportunists. And I need to be reminded that wealthy white-collar criminals don't often experience the same kind prison as does the common man.
[ Parent | on HN ]