News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GitFlow considered harmful. Parent comment

Re:GitFlow considered harmful by pc86 on Friday June 19, 2015 @03:46PM (#9747208)
In that scenario is everything in develop simply waiting to be pushed to master, with no additional testing/approval? At that point why not push directly from feature branches into master?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitFlow considered harmful by Skinney on Friday June 19, 2015 @06:57PM (#9748174)
Because features are not always isolated, sometimes they change behaviour based on changes in other branches. Testing features in isolation is different from testing an entire release.
[ Parent | on HN ]