News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitFlow considered harmful by giulianob on Friday June 19, 2015 @09:19AM (#9744462)
Also this is a problem with Git not GitFlow. In Mercurial, for example, every commit is attached to a branch so it's very easy to follow where the changes happened.
Re:GitFlow considered harmful by ryanthejuggler on Friday June 19, 2015 @09:23AM (#9744483)
Ironically, for that reason, GitFlow would work better in Mercurial. Go figure.
Re:GitFlow considered harmful by davidism on Friday June 19, 2015 @11:41AM (#9745502)
HgFlow already exists and is actively developed: https://bitbucket.org/yujiewu/hgflow/wiki/Home. It even goes above and beyond GitFlow and adds generalized streams and sub-streams. I've never had to use those extra features, but the core model works well.
Re:GitFlow considered harmful by glandium on Friday June 19, 2015 @07:29PM (#9748282)
Mercurial branches are not meant to be used for short-lived feature branches, though. As "hg branch" puts it: "branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?".
Re:GitFlow considered harmful by giulianob on Friday June 19, 2015 @08:58PM (#9748507)
You can close a branch and it will not show up as being active but you still have the info for every commit which is what makes history readable.