Re:Why Greet Apple's Swift 2.0 With Open Arms?
by ascagnel_ on Thursday June 18, 2015 @01:12PM
(#9740101)
You don't have to "give back" (push your changes back upstream), but you do need to put your changes out there to comply with the license once you begin distribution.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Greet Apple's Swift 2.0 With Open Arms?
by icebraining on Thursday June 18, 2015 @02:49PM
(#9740794)
Not "out there," just to give the source to the receivers of binaries.
I know that in the context of B2C that sounds like an irrelevant distinction, but in B2B, it isn't - such software is often distributed only to a handful of organizations, who have no interest in becoming redistributers even if they have the right to do so.
I can tell you that there are lots of derivatives of copyleft software that are never made available to the original developers, in a perfectly legal way, and people who are choosing a license for their code should realize that.