News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Greet Apple's Swift 2.0 With Open Arms? by laumars on Thursday June 18, 2015 @07:56AM (#9737988)
> CUPS is owned by Apple

CUPS was bought by Apple. It was originally GPL software and was incorporated into OS X a few years before Apple bought it.

> Mach, OpenSSH, OpenSSL & Apache are not copyleft.

Fair point, I did actually mean open source in the more general sense than the copyleft subset of open licences.

> The success of Apple has nothing to do with the copyleft software they use....Now if you say "open source has been an integral part on the success of Apple", I would agree with that.

I sense you're nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking :) In any case, I think we agree the same point.

edit: why is this comment getting downvoted so much yet not one single correction posted? Please guys, don't just downvote because you dislike the tangent I started in my previous post. Take this comment in isolation and if you still disagree with me then explain why.

Re:Why Greet Apple's Swift 2.0 With Open Arms? by carussell on Thursday June 18, 2015 @09:38AM (#9738410)
Someone has gone through and downvoted multiple comments that mention Apple's purchase of the rights to the CUPS code. I don't get it.

To whomever is taking issue with this, could you, uh, you know... say why?