News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:From Asm.js to WebAssembly by stcredzero on Wednesday June 17, 2015 @01:59PM (#9733917)
it's not polyfillable

I'd be interested to know where/when this "polyfillable" term came about. It's not readily Google-able yet.

Re:From Asm.js to WebAssembly by sunfish on Wednesday June 17, 2015 @02:05PM (#9733971)
Re:From Asm.js to WebAssembly by csense on Wednesday June 17, 2015 @06:55PM (#9735803)
If you dig through my comment history, you might be able to find a comment I wrote on my first exposure to this term maybe ~2 years ago. I was utterly befuddled because I thought it was a graphics rendering algorithm (setting pixels in a framebuffer corresponding to the interior of a polygon specified as an edge list), and was horribly confused about why an article discussing some web technology would suddenly transition into a geometric problem utterly disconnected from the original topic.
Re:From Asm.js to WebAssembly by Retra on Thursday June 18, 2015 @02:15AM (#9737080)
It's a pretty awful term...
Re:From Asm.js to WebAssembly by SquareWheel on Thursday June 18, 2015 @06:24AM (#9737690)
It sure beats "shiv" though. Glad that one has started fading.
Re:From Asm.js to WebAssembly by pokpokpok on Thursday June 18, 2015 @09:17AM (#9738295)
shim makes much more sense than shiv
Re:From Asm.js to WebAssembly by 0xdeadbeefbabe on Wednesday June 17, 2015 @04:14PM (#9734931)
Spackle would have been a fun term.