Re:EFF and Eight Other Privacy Orgs Back Out of NTIA Face Re...
by drpgq on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @04:39PM
(#9728552)
I'm a researcher at a face recognition company. A big pair of dark sunglasses still does a pretty good job of obscuring your identity (although obviously not as good as a mask). Adding a hat with a brim pulled low helps out even more.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:EFF and Eight Other Privacy Orgs Back Out of NTIA Face Re...
by therobot24 on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @05:01PM
(#9728672)
Don't forget that NIR cameras (often used for iris recognition) can still see through those glasses. But i agree, stuff similar to the challenges in the AR face dataset [1] will usually stump most employed systems.
Re:EFF and Eight Other Privacy Orgs Back Out of NTIA Face Re...
by drpgq on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @10:18PM
(#9729781)
True although the commercial deployment of NIR face recognition isn't that extensive (I'm not saying it doesn't exist however). I know for our company's software that academics have been trying to use it with NIR images even though our software wasn't trained at all for it.
I do think that NIR will eventually become more important (especially for car applications) and really the main stumbling block is massive sets of training data for it.
Re:EFF and Eight Other Privacy Orgs Back Out of NTIA Face Re...
by therobot24 on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @11:22PM
(#9729918)
Yea the NIR wavelength makes the skin lose a lot of discrimination ability. Don't know how familiar you are with the FOCS, SCFace, or PolyU datasets, but they're a good start for training (of course very few papers use them, they'd rather gain an extra 0.1% on LFW).