News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EFF and Eight Other Privacy Orgs Back Out of NTIA Face Re... by drpgq on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @04:39PM (#9728552)
I'm a researcher at a face recognition company. A big pair of dark sunglasses still does a pretty good job of obscuring your identity (although obviously not as good as a mask). Adding a hat with a brim pulled low helps out even more.
Re:EFF and Eight Other Privacy Orgs Back Out of NTIA Face Re... by therobot24 on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @05:01PM (#9728672)
Don't forget that NIR cameras (often used for iris recognition) can still see through those glasses. But i agree, stuff similar to the challenges in the AR face dataset [1] will usually stump most employed systems.

[1] http://www2.ece.ohio-state.edu/~aleix/ARdatabase.html

Re:EFF and Eight Other Privacy Orgs Back Out of NTIA Face Re... by drpgq on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @10:18PM (#9729781)
True although the commercial deployment of NIR face recognition isn't that extensive (I'm not saying it doesn't exist however). I know for our company's software that academics have been trying to use it with NIR images even though our software wasn't trained at all for it.

I do think that NIR will eventually become more important (especially for car applications) and really the main stumbling block is massive sets of training data for it.

Re:EFF and Eight Other Privacy Orgs Back Out of NTIA Face Re... by therobot24 on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @11:22PM (#9729918)
Yea the NIR wavelength makes the skin lose a lot of discrimination ability. Don't know how familiar you are with the FOCS, SCFace, or PolyU datasets, but they're a good start for training (of course very few papers use them, they'd rather gain an extra 0.1% on LFW).
Re:EFF and Eight Other Privacy Orgs Back Out of NTIA Face Re... by mirimir on Wednesday June 17, 2015 @05:15AM (#9730720)
What about mirror shades?