News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Profile of Linus Torvalds by bobajeff on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @02:09PM (#9727677)
What about Unix, CP/M, DOS..? None of those are kernels yet they were said to be operating systems and before GNU was announced.

My question is has Linus ever considered Linux to be the operating system rather than just the name of the kernel?

Re:Profile of Linus Torvalds by donuteaters on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @05:02PM (#9728679)
Actually, all of those have something strongly resembling a kernel, and DOS in particular makes a nice distinction between the basic services (BIOS) and whatever userland you choose to install on top of it. I think you're making my point - "Operating System" used to mean the "kernel" before RMS wanted to ride on Linux's coat tails and Microsoft wanted to bundle their browser anti-competitively - both of which are distasteful.
Re:Profile of Linus Torvalds by wang_li on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @03:51PM (#9728319)
Depends... if the conversation is a short coming in any part of Linux that isn't the kernel, then Linux means the kernel. If it's something positive, then Linux is the kernel, boot code, userland, and anything else that can be fit under the umbrella.