News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:KeePass – questionable security by imglorp on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @01:59PM (#9727603)
Do you care about that kind of side channel for an offline vault?

If your adversaries are on your box while you operate your vault, then you have already lost because they will also have keyloggers, strace, etc.

Re:KeePass – questionable security by Nogwater on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @02:29PM (#9727817)
What if they hack your dropbox account and get a copy of the vault that way? They're not on your box, but now they can try to break into your vault.
Re:KeePass – questionable security by gnud on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @02:46PM (#9727950)
Well, the decryption code is open source. And they have the ciphertext. So what does a timing attack give the attacker?

If keeppass removes the possible timing attack, the attacker could just add it back in and use their own client, if they have a copy of your database.

Re:KeePass – questionable security by imglorp on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @03:04PM (#9728077)
Then a timing side channel is not relevant, because they won't be watching you operate the vault. Right?
Re:KeePass – questionable security by benedikt on Wednesday June 17, 2015 @10:18AM (#9731878)
Why be OK with bad crypto?