Re:South Korea provokes teenage smartphone privacy row
by TazeTSchnitzel on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @09:01AM
(#9725397)
Rating systems have teeth, yes. But the "some viewers may find the following images disturbing"-type warnings, to which trigger warnings are equivalent, don't have teeth. They're voluntary guidance. Think also of epilepsy warnings.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:South Korea provokes teenage smartphone privacy row
by cactusface on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @09:10AM
(#9725439)
I think plenty of people would alter their content to avoid warnings, regardless of context. But, I only have data for the MPAA and also maybe recordings with explicit lyrics. I don't necessarily think warnings are bad, I just think that in general, if you're going to label people's work in a negative way, some people would rather change their work so that it doesn't get labelled like that. I mean, I try to be polite on HN so that it doesn't get downvoted and greyed out, but this isn't really that bad of a thing.
Re:South Korea provokes teenage smartphone privacy row
by TazeTSchnitzel on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @09:14AM
(#9725458)
I can see where you're coming from. Removing content because you'd have to warn viewers about it makes sense, I suppose.
Though trigger warnings don't mean the work is "bad", just it might cause problems for a small fraction of viewers.
Re:South Korea provokes teenage smartphone privacy row
by cactusface on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @09:22AM
(#9725507)
Yeah, I think we basically agree. I was just nitpicking.