Re:When Solid State Drives Are Not That Solid
by simoncion on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @02:30AM
(#9724116)
> With Samsungs finished-forms walling the company already tells Linux users to not expect any support, at all.
I'm sorry. I'm too dumb to parse this. :( Would you kindly rephrase it?
Thanks much. :)
I'm sorry. I'm too dumb to parse this. :(
I am sorry. I was too dumb to phrase it understandibly, so the shame is on me. The sentence smelled problematic to me but after several times rereading it I concluded it is understandable. I should have gone with my guts…Here is another try: Samsung's support walls with prewritten answers that say Linux is open and thus Linux is unsupported, and this action of Samsung is consisting with the testbed-theory.
Re:When Solid State Drives Are Not That Solid
by simoncion on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @08:11AM
(#9725153)
Don't sweat it, I'm the king of less-than-comprehensible statements. :)
Anyway, I get your statement now. Maybe instead of saying "walls" you should say "stonewalls" (derived from "stonewalling")?
Re:When Solid State Drives Are Not That Solid
by buffportion on Tuesday June 16, 2015 @08:06AM
(#9725135)
I think the confusion stems from your verbing of "wall".
With Samsungs finished-forms walling the company already tells Linux users to not expect any support, at all. So, that is consisting with the testbed-theory.