[1] - http://www.wsj.com/articles/mlbs-streaming-tech-unit-goes-pr...
You can say that about any number of startups that focus on delivering content: Netflix, Steam, Youtube, etc.
> and the revenue model is biased toward dividend type payouts rather than reinvestment for continued growth. This may make it a lucrative business line, but it doesn't make it a startup.
MLBAM has had both dividend payouts and reinvestment. They were started with a $77 million initial investment [1] and turned it into a $5 billion business in a decade and a half. You don't get that kind of growth without reinvestment.
> It started on third base not ramen.
Can't disagree, but isn't that the point of an accelerator? Isn't that supposed to be the differentiator between going to someone like Y Combinator before going to a VC? They are supposed to give startups a head start and guidance that they wouldn't normally receive in order to help them be more successful.
[1] - http://www.fastcompany.com/1822802/mlb-advanced-medias-bob-b...
Neither was built on the value of exclusive rights to content. My understanding is that this is mostly true for s Steam as well, but I don't know as much about its evolution. MLABAM didn't go through an accelerator so RoboCop is riding a unicorn on that one.
Hey kids! Fill out this form along with thousands of others. If we fancy the way you fill it out and if you know how to play with computers dandily then we'll throw money at you like a sunday at the horsetracks.
Oh, some more pied piper hooli reference here and there to keep this cynicism timely and relevant.