Re:Detecting PhantomJS Based Visitors
by pikzen on Sunday June 14, 2015 @09:15AM
(#9714768)
Every single method relies on detecting something sent by PhantomJS. The author even admits that it's spoofable in the first few tests, but then the 4 last do not have this mentioned. Forking PhantomJS to send out data that looks like a normal browser would take ten minutes.
I'm not sure what the point of this is. An honest title would be "detect phantomjs by trusting the client". It's completely stupid.
I'm not sure what the point of this is. An honest title would be "detect phantomjs by trusting the client". It's completely stupid.