News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why did Borland fail? by thejosh on Saturday June 13, 2015 @08:47PM (#9713368)
I'm just curious those using Sublime how they debug their programs?
Re:Why did Borland fail? by malyk on Saturday June 13, 2015 @09:44PM (#9713517)
Ruby web dev here...I pretty much use liberal puts statements (actually the awesome_print) gem. It's never really been a problem for me with ruby. 2001-2007 I was primarily a Java developer and the debugger was essential. But since switching to ruby in 2007 I've just never felt the need. I think it's probably the cycle time...we were using BEA weblogic as our Java server and cycle times weren't quick so you didn't want to waste time and needed to be able to step through the code. With ruby/rails it's almost instant to see your logging so I've never even looked into how to use a debugger in ruby.
Re:Why did Borland fail? by ollysb on Saturday June 13, 2015 @10:01PM (#9713555)
Another ruby dev, back in my java days I used debuggers from jbuilder and eclipse. I now use pry and much prefer it as an experience. I found having everything at your fingertips rather than scattered around a gui far more efficient.
Re:Why did Borland fail? by jdalt on Saturday June 13, 2015 @10:57PM (#9713678)
Re:Why did Borland fail? by amorphid on Monday June 15, 2015 @09:26AM (#9719128)
I use pry-byebug most of the time.
Re:Why did Borland fail? by busterarm on Sunday June 14, 2015 @05:04AM (#9714259)
byebug, pry

or even better, pry-byebug!