Re:Ruins of forgotten empires: APL Languages (2013)
by eggy on Saturday June 13, 2015 @12:41AM
(#9709890)
Your statement validates his statement. Just because R-based development teams are in number, does not make quality, and vice versa: APL or J programmers may be lower in numbers, but you may be getting better quality.
The catapult was invented, and then forgotten, and had to be re-invented. In today's age with the internet, and the relatively short span of computer science, I must say I agree that the short-sightedness seems worse.
I play with APL/J and I like Julia and Haskell. To me J (APL) are close to the succinctness and expressiveness of mathematical formula, and they work naturally with arrays, no batteries needed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ruins of forgotten empires: APL Languages (2013)
by dkhenry on Saturday June 13, 2015 @09:46PM
(#9713523)
It sounds like you both have this ideal of quality that theoretical quality counts for something, even expressed quality doesn't really matter that much if you can't bring _quantity_ to bear.