News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem by angersock on Thursday June 11, 2015 @11:56AM (#9700437)
Generally agree, but the short-cut hair makes a great deal of sense if you don't want a suspect pulling on your scalp.
Re:Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem by 3pt14159 on Thursday June 11, 2015 @12:27PM (#9700637)
De-escalation is more effective than the slight tactical advantage.
Re:Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem by Someone1234 on Thursday June 11, 2015 @12:37PM (#9700713)
But de-escalation training is expensive, whereas equipment is often given almost for free from ex-military surplus or paid for from "anti-terrorism" federal funds.

Police in other Western countries receive significantly longer training courses than US police do. This is an issue rarely discussed in this topic. If people want de-escalation, they need to fund the longer training regime and more importantly pay for it.

Re:Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem by jpreiland on Thursday June 11, 2015 @02:15PM (#9701316)
>ex-military surplus

maybe reallocating funds from military to de-escalation training would reduce surplus and improve police image and effectiveness.

(disclaimer: I don't know what I'm talking about)

Re:Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem by Crito on Thursday June 11, 2015 @12:42PM (#9700747)
Has it really come to vilifying a haircut? The haircut is not to blame for anything here, it is all the people who may happen to wear it.

Short hair is pragmatic, but more importantly, it is a personal preference. Nobody should be criticized for wearing short hair. Doing that makes you no better than people who talk about "long-haired hippies" disparagingly.

Re:Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem by 3pt14159 on Thursday June 11, 2015 @01:44PM (#9701158)
It isn't just the haircut on its own. If there wasn't a history of this:

http://www.forgetthebox.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Ameri...

Like say the police looked more like this:

http://cdn.caughtoffside.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Swed...

Then haircut wouldn't matter. But I have yet to meet an American cop that didn't have a "military approved" haircut.

Re:Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem by thesteamboat on Thursday June 11, 2015 @04:59PM (#9702394)
Off topic, but this brought to mind an amusing anecdote about Hunter S. Thompson. When he ran for Sheriff's office of Aspen, CO, he shaved his head bald and referred to the (ex-army, Republican) incumbent he was running against as "my long-haired opponent".
Re:Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem by ZanyProgrammer on Thursday June 11, 2015 @11:57AM (#9700442)
Yet female cops get by just fine without high and tights.
Re:Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem by angersock on Thursday June 11, 2015 @12:00PM (#9700463)
Have you seen catfights? If they're serious about this "warrior" business, they should probably get buzzed down too.

EDIT:

Wow hivemind. It's for a similar reason that, in less hostile environments (say, machine shops), people with long hair put their hair back. It's like nobody's ever seen Bomb Girls before (much less any of the much more graphic images of, say, lathe accidents).

I'm not suggesting that the warrior mindset is acceptable...merely that, if they are going to carry themselves that way (i.e., as jackbooted thugs), they should probably go all the way.

Re:Law Enforcement’s “Warrior” Problem by remarkEon on Thursday June 11, 2015 @02:23PM (#9701361)
I see where you're going with that premise, but there's a particular character in The Wire that was one of David Simon's not-so-subtle devices to critique militarization of the police. A three-finger fade is wholly unnecessary.