Re:Harvard study: Computers don't save hospitals money
by jhancock on Tuesday December 01, 2009 @09:49AM
(#969805)
great summary. I've noticed the VA system is quite good as well and have been trying to see why other institutions don't use it. I assume the taxpayer already paid to create it, so why not open source the product and let people integrate?
Re:Harvard study: Computers don't save hospitals money
by jberryman on Tuesday December 01, 2009 @10:59AM
(#969940)
I can't find a link right now, but a month or two ago there was an interview on NPR with the author of (I believe) this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Best-Care-Anywhere-Health-Better/dp/09...
In the interview he talked about how some doctors at the VA hacked together a computerized medical records system in the 70s, and how having these computerized records actually allowed the VA doctors to discover links between some dangerous drugs and disease. That's in addition to the benefits of a doctors being able to pull up 30 years of your medical history on a screen.
Wish I could remember details about the interview, but the book is probably good.
Re:Harvard study: Computers don't save hospitals money
by j_b_f on Tuesday December 01, 2009 @10:12AM
(#969849)
VistA has an open source release called OpenVistA that is pretty well-supported: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openvista/
He said that problem is that American private hospitals already are highly computerized, it's just that the computer systems are focused entirely billing and not at all on medical records management.
When they decide to get an EMRS, hospitals turn to their billing software vendor to provide them with something integrated with their billing systems. The vendors tack something on to the billing software without adequate requirements gathering amongst the actual nurses who will use it, so the result is a system that simply does not have the proper workflow for managing patient medical records.
While EMRSes like the Veterans Administration's VistA program exist and are well-liked by nurses and doctors, they provide no functionality to ensure that you get billed $20 for each tongue depressor used. That functionality is, of course, of primary importance to private hospital administrators. So effective EMR software gets passed over unless it integrates with hospitals' existing billing infrastructure, and the hospital billing system vendors build terrible EMR software.