Re:Google: 90% of our engineers use the software you wrote (...
by Retric on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @11:59PM
(#9697427)
Nothing you said actually means they could not have done the job. You basically said, we gave them a test and they failed so clearly the test was a good idea.
The only way to validate your highering process is to randomly accept people you would otherwise fail. Anything else is meaningless.
I had them attempt to solve the problems on a whiteboard that I would give to our intern candidates. Both totally bombed hard, and our other "re-interviewers" had the same result when they asked some design-related and algorithmic related questions.
This wasn't "regurgitating algorithms". It was basic problem-solving and software design. From their track record of development we didn't believe them to be qualified (despite their own opinion of themselves), and they only confirmed it by totally bombing the "re-interview" process (which was identical to our normal interview process).