Re:The next version of Safari will let users block ads on iP...
by lelandbatey on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @07:23PM
(#9696337)
Your third point is completely false.
According to Opera Mediaworks, as of Q1 2015, Android makes up 65% of mobile traffic, 3x more than iOS with 22%, as well as beating iOS out of the top spot for ad revenue. You can read this report here: http://operamediaworks.com/sites/default/files/file_attachme... (page 2)
Re:The next version of Safari will let users block ads on iP...
by threeseed on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @07:59PM
(#9696506)
Not completely false. From that document the revenue for iOS/Android is nearly identical across all media types and for video/rich media (the most lucrative revenue wise) is much higher for iOS. It just reaffirms my argument that iOS users are too much of a valuable and lucrative audience to treat poorly.
And I am sure those numbers are worldwide when really US revenue is the most relevant for US publishers (which are the bulk of major news sites). In which case Apple dominates:
http://www.cnet.com/news/apple-outshines-android-in-us-mobil...
Re:The next version of Safari will let users block ads on iP...
by endymi0n on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @07:18PM
(#9696320)
True. But don't underestimate the efforts of a multiple billion dollars content industry with their back against the wall (a lot of them ads only without any freemium option). Robbed of any monetization strategy for a whole segment (unlike the ads vs. paywall wars between publishers), I see much more collaboration coming against a too invasive force with their own objectives.
So if publishers adopt a freemium model (the most common) and they present a crappy experience to users who block ads then they won't be willing to buy a subscription. That's why most websites today don't punish users who block ads and that position will likely continue on mobile as well.