[deleted]
Re:I've implemented a new HTTP/1.1 request and response pars...
by weaksauce on Tuesday December 01, 2009 @01:08AM
(#969328)
For the record, and I am sure it's what you meant, a more specific description of Judy arrays is that they are a specific type of trie(though a trie is a specialization of a tree a trie is more rigorous.)
Re:I've implemented a new HTTP/1.1 request and response pars...
by andreyf on Tuesday December 01, 2009 @01:13AM
(#969333)
Judy Arrays are all Tries are all Trees, but only some Trees are Tries, and only some Tries are Judy Arrays.
Re:I've implemented a new HTTP/1.1 request and response pars...
by pstuart on Tuesday December 01, 2009 @01:13AM
(#969332)
This of i.e. as 'that is' and e.g. as "example given'.
Re:I've implemented a new HTTP/1.1 request and response pars...
by ramchip on Tuesday December 01, 2009 @01:35AM
(#969352)
the only public implementation is GPLed
Actually no. Here's a BSD one: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/judy
Re:I've implemented a new HTTP/1.1 request and response pars...
by codexon on Tuesday December 01, 2009 @02:05AM
(#969378)
Actually no. That's only a binding if you look at the source code.
The sole C source code is only about 2-3 lines long with a "#include <Judy.h>" which isn't even included while the haskell source is littered with foreign function calls.
I discussed this issue with Don on my website a couple of months ago: http://www.codexon.com/posts/why-arent-functional-languages-...
and believe me, he would have told me if he really did have a completely reimplemented Judy array.
Judy arrays were only invented and publicized in 2004 and the only public implementation is GPLed.