News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Matrices, diagrammatically by lisper on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @05:47PM (#9695738)
Best to start at the beginning and read through:

http://graphicallinearalgebra.net

Re:Matrices, diagrammatically by mrcactu5 on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @05:20PM (#9695517)
I am guessing these diagrams are taken from Electrical Engineering and not Quantum Physics.

The blog looks like an expansion of their paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.7048v3

Yes! That's where I have seen these diagrams before. They are Hopf algebras, which appear both in Electrical Engineering and Theoretical Physics.

Re:Matrices, diagrammatically by JadeNB on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @06:58PM (#9696229)
Baez discussed the paper on the n-Category Café, and it may be easier for the inexperienced (like me!) to get started there: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2015/05/props_for_linea... .
Re:Matrices, diagrammatically by Garlef on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @08:58PM (#9696744)
Very impressive if the author developed this by himself. But this is a well known idea from category theory:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_diagram

Re:Matrices, diagrammatically by kzrdude on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @05:12PM (#9695442)
This reminds me of something I never understood fully: Penrose's tensor notation.
Re:Matrices, diagrammatically by marxshrugged on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @05:05PM (#9695384)
I am still trying to wrap my head around this, but the parallels with functional programming are striking.
Re:Matrices, diagrammatically by Garlef on Wednesday June 10, 2015 @09:07PM (#9696780)
String diagrams are a way to describe morphisms (think functions) in monoidal categories.

A construction using monoidal categories (or a slight generalisation) can be used to give a categorical model for arrows.

http://bentnib.org/arrows.pdf

This gives rise to these diagrams:

https://www.haskell.org/arrows/