News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The End Of The CrunchPad by nir on Monday November 30, 2009 @03:16PM (#968579)
"A major multi-billion dollar retail partner has been [..] offering to sell the CrunchPad at a zero margin to help us succeed in the early days. They were also willing to pay for the devices on order instead of 30 days after delivery, a crucial cash flow benefit [..] Intel [..] has assisted us repeatedly with engineering and partner advice, and gave us pricing that was ridiculously generous [..] Other partners were eager to promote and sell the device for little or no benefit on their end other than “supporting the project.”"

Does anyone see a problem here? You think TechCrunch would be able to honestly report on these "partners" while being in such close relationship with them?

Re:The End Of The CrunchPad by bjclark on Monday November 30, 2009 @08:39PM (#969069)
You really think Arrington is an impartial news source? Really?
Re:The End Of The CrunchPad by petercooper on Tuesday December 01, 2009 @02:32AM (#969414)
Is anyone or any company really totally impartial or without bias? Even the BBC, which tries to live up to such ideals on the taxpayer's dime, can't quite get there.
Re:The End Of The CrunchPad by nir on Tuesday December 01, 2009 @12:14PM (#970115)
Nobody is totally impartial, but one can at least attempt to be. Journalists are not supposed to be invested in the market they cover.