“Swift will be open source later this year”

Re:“Swift will be open source later this year” by 72deluxe on Tuesday June 09, 2015 @06:15AM (#9684952)

That's really good that it's so dumb that you don't need to jump through hoops to think of the way to do it. Clever! Just code and go!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Swift will be open source later this year” by dmacvicar on Tuesday June 09, 2015 @11:45AM (#9686576)

It is not unicorns either.

* Transforming a collection means doing boring for loops instead of one-liners. * interfaces/duck typing is great. But hey, []interface{} does not fit into interface{}. * Structs with fields are encouraged, but there is no uniform Uniform access principle and that sucks. * etc

But definitely, my own "science" confirms that it turned to be out less of a problem (for my own usage) compared to better languages with more friction.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“Swift will be open source later this year” by sacado2 on Tuesday June 09, 2015 @11:58AM (#9686652)

Yep. I've been bored by the fact that putting an []int into an []interface{} doesn't work, too (although the reason is obvious).

[ Parent | on HN ]