News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:2010: The Year Information Pollution Takes Off by chrischen on Monday November 30, 2009 @02:30PM (#968483)
Shouldn't Google optimize it's search to find the best content, and not the other way around.

I just think it's ridiculous that Google's ranking system needs to be gamed if you want your content to be found.

Re:2010: The Year Information Pollution Takes Off by JulianMorrison on Monday November 30, 2009 @03:14PM (#968575)
Google's algorithm only "needs to be gamed" if your content is unworthy or undesirable.
Re:2010: The Year Information Pollution Takes Off by chrischen on Monday November 30, 2009 @04:06PM (#968676)
And if your content is unworthy or undesirable and you game it, then that forces worthy and desirable content to game it too in order to compete.
Re:2010: The Year Information Pollution Takes Off by transburgh on Monday November 30, 2009 @02:47PM (#968515)
that is not logical because everyone wants their content found and there are only 10 spots on the first page (and adding more results per page does not fix the issue)

At some point you need a way to rank the sites

Re:2010: The Year Information Pollution Takes Off by chrischen on Monday November 30, 2009 @04:05PM (#968674)
Everyone wants their content to be found, but that doesn't mean everyone's content is equally worthy based on content or relevance.

Obviously you need to rank the sites, but it just seems to me that the ranking algorithm they use doesn't correlate that well with relevance if it has to be gamed.

Re:2010: The Year Information Pollution Takes Off by DanielBMarkham on Monday November 30, 2009 @02:33PM (#968492)
I just think it's ridiculous that Google's ranking system needs to be gamed if you want your content to be found.

Why? It's just an algorithm. There's nothing magic or special about it.

Re:2010: The Year Information Pollution Takes Off by chrischen on Monday November 30, 2009 @04:06PM (#968678)
It can be improved to correlate more closely with relevancy.