The magic in this case being "for the categories he defines." I do so much enjoy articles that re-define the general consensus on terms so that the author can try to shift entries among categories in a way that makes their product look better. It feels like watching a biologist try to create a taxonomy based on "greenness" and "whether or not this creature tastes good when served with hollandaise sauce."
So yeah, for the categories he defines, that's what makes sense.