“A Statement with My View on Curtis Yarvin and Strange Loop”

Re:“A Statement with My View on Curtis Yarvin and Strange Loop” by tptacek on Monday June 08, 2015 @04:15PM (#9682072)

If that's true, that wasn't a great thing for him to have done.

Later: a cursory look at Klabnik's feed suggests it's likely to be true. Again: not a great thing for Klabnik to have done.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“A Statement with My View on Curtis Yarvin and Strange Loop” by steveklabnik on Tuesday June 09, 2015 @03:05PM (#9687906)

I said that I have not been to Strangeloop before, but that's because it's scheduled during the busiest conference weekend of the year, and I historically always have conflicts. This year, I have a conference that overlaps the first day, and am trying to decide if I can make it work.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“A Statement with My View on Curtis Yarvin and Strange Loop” by yebyen on Friday June 12, 2015 @07:02PM (#9709107)

I am not upset. The Urbit folks have hit the repos with renewed vigor, and more people are talking Urbit on Twitter this week than in the 10-20 prior weeks combined. If you're pleased with the outcome too, then we're both glad.

[ Parent | on HN ]

[dead]

Re:“A Statement with My View on Curtis Yarvin and Strange Loop” by tptacek on Thursday June 11, 2015 @06:48PM (#9702960)

Personal attacks are unwelcome on HN. I think I actually agree with the substance of your argument, but you made it repellent by phrasing it that way.

[ Parent | on HN ]