News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Zlib-ng: a performance-oriented fork of zlib by Dead2 on Friday June 05, 2015 @01:27PM (#9666732)
As I mentioned in another comment, the minigzip used is very suboptimal due to reading and decompressing only 1 byte per inflate() call. Please retest with --zlib-compat or the fix that was merged today.
Re:Zlib-ng: a performance-oriented fork of zlib by jsnell on Friday June 05, 2015 @02:00PM (#9666931)
Sure thing, updated.

I'm not in the habit of including compression level 6 in the results, since the application I care about defaults to 5 :) And I wanted a good spread of different compression levels in the results.