News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“It appears that SourceForge took control of the 'GIMP fo... by Karunamon on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @12:01PM (#9612281)
Wow. Is this legally actionable? Yeah yeah, their server and so forth, but pretending to be somebody is generally seen as a Bad Thing© by the courts.
Re:“It appears that SourceForge took control of the 'GIMP fo... by shiggerino on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @01:06PM (#9612777)
What's with the copyright symbol?
Re:“It appears that SourceForge took control of the 'GIMP fo... by Karunamon on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @01:22PM (#9612895)
A copyright that's been registered by Sourceforge ;)
Re:“It appears that SourceForge took control of the 'GIMP fo... by shiggerino on Thursday May 28, 2015 @03:58AM (#9616651)
I don't see how the phrase 'Bad Thing' alone is a copyrightable work. And even if it was (say, it was typeset in a particular fashion, or part of a greater work), registration would be unnecessary.

Sarcastic use of the trademark (™) and registered trademark (®) symbols is a common rhetorical device, but copyright doesn't make much sense. The "intellectual property" propagandists do their best to confuse people into thinking that copyright, trademarks and patents are the same thing, perhaps that's why you're confusing the two?

Re:“It appears that SourceForge took control of the 'GIMP fo... by javawizard on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @02:31PM (#9613397)
By which you mean a trademark?
Re:“It appears that SourceForge took control of the 'GIMP fo... by Karunamon on Thursday May 28, 2015 @09:55AM (#9618132)
You both are putting a heck of a lot of effort into nitpicking a single character used for humorous effect :/
Re:“It appears that SourceForge took control of the 'GIMP fo... by shiggerino on Friday May 29, 2015 @01:29PM (#9625988)
It's worth nitpicking about, for several reasons.

It would be a shame if a young entrepreneur thought their trademark was protected by the Berne convention and someone came and took it. It would be a shame if the Mickey Mouse lobby went completely unopposed because people can't think critically about what they don't know. It would be a shame if a large corporation could grab the trademark of a small free software charity because people don't think it's "a big deal".