Why investors don’t fund dating

Re:Why investors don’t fund dating by tlb on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @03:37PM (#9607119)

He botches the math. 20% monthly churn means you have to replace your customer base 2.4 times over a year, not 8 times. But the conclusion is the same: CAC > LTV.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why investors don’t fund dating by shasta on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @03:43PM (#9607151)

I assume his formula (1+monthly_churn)^12 – 1 was based on a misremembering or misunderstanding of annual churn = 1 - (1-monthly_churn)^12.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why investors don’t fund dating by andrew_null on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @04:33PM (#9607457)

OP here. You're right, I'll update for math.

[ Parent | on HN ]