Re:Uber: Disability Laws Don’t Apply to Us
by toomuchtodo on Friday May 22, 2015 @03:18PM
(#9590402)
> No alternatives given for fixing the problems that legislation engenders for commerce, just irrational hatred.
Not hatred, disgust. There's a significant difference.
What good is a service attempting to "disrupt" regulation if it lowers the quality of life for the most in need? THAT is not progress.
Re:Uber: Disability Laws Don’t Apply to Us
by vinceguidry on Friday May 22, 2015 @04:49PM
(#9590846)
> There's a significant difference.
Not in that they're both irrational.
Re:Uber: Disability Laws Don’t Apply to Us
by toomuchtodo on Friday May 22, 2015 @05:41PM
(#9591012)
Wanting to be on the moral side of technological progress is by no means irrational.
Re:Uber: Disability Laws Don’t Apply to Us
by vinceguidry on Friday May 22, 2015 @05:51PM
(#9591037)
The law is not necessarily moral.
You forgot labor laws.
I'm sorry you feel that way. I've attempted to lay out a rationale from as close to first principles as I can reasonably approach for the right relationship startups should have with the law and society and you've ignored it out of disgust.
No alternatives given for fixing the problems that legislation engenders for commerce, just irrational hatred.