Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012)
by Daishiman on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @10:45PM
(#9580668)
The amount of things in C++ to avoid practically constitute a language by itself.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012)
by moonchrome on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @11:57PM
(#9580879)
Another amusing part is that it's a moving target - some parts of the language actually got better with implementations and spec improvements - so there's a large number of people avoiding useful features on outdated practices (they learned "don't use X" without the reasoning behind it :) )