News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012). Parent comment

Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012) by kinghajj on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @08:08PM (#9580217)
Do you mean "unsafe" instead of "undefined"?

Here's what I found after a Google search, by one of the core Rust devs (unsurprisingly).

https://github.com/pcwalton/multilist

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012) by cesarb on Thursday May 21, 2015 @09:24AM (#9582531)
No, I really meant undefined: http://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/reference.html#behavior-cons...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++ (2012) by detrino on Thursday May 21, 2015 @01:31AM (#9581112)
That's not an intrusive list, it does an allocation for each node.
[ Parent | on HN ]