News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sprite: a different drone by toomuchtodo on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @03:23PM (#9572480)
Wireless power transmission via laser:

> Stalker is a small, silent UAS used by Special Operations Forces since 2006 to perform intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions. In a recent wind tunnel test, the UAS demonstrated 48 hours of continuous flight powered by this innovative laser system.

> Demonstrated net positive power to Stalker in flight, at ranges up to 600 meters.

> The beam director tracked the receiver for long periods, with centimeter accuracy at 500 meters, despite turbulence and aircraft maneuvers.

http://lasermotive.com/products/uav-power-links/

Note they first successfully demonstrated this outdoors 3 years ago: http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/news/press-releases/2012/au...

Re:Sprite: a different drone by tomswartz07 on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @03:36PM (#9572572)
This is genuinely awesome and I'm excited to see it's applications in future products.

HOWEVER: I don't think it's ready for 'consumer grade' things just yet. It's one thing to have it in a controlled wind-tunnel for 48 hours, it's completely different than having it outside and in variable wind, dirt, dust, other objects, etc.

Honestly, I can't imagine my luddite brother or father wrapping their minds around this just yet: "So, I point the laser at this? Why can't I just use a flashlight? Can I use the laser to charge my phone?"

Re:Sprite: a different drone by fletchowns on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @03:49PM (#9572652)
How stealthy is this thing if it has a giant laser pointed at it the whole time?
Re:Sprite: a different drone by semi-extrinsic on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @05:22PM (#9573224)
We have this thing called infrared. The military is quite fond of it already for targeting lasers.
Re:Sprite: a different drone by toomuchtodo on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @04:00PM (#9572718)
Beam coherence and illumination aren't issues at the distance and power levels used.
Re:Sprite: a different drone by lsaferite on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @04:58PM (#9573090)
Huh.

That's actually really interesting.

I have this vision of a large mother UAV with long loiter times that can laser target micro UAVs at much lower altitudes.

Re:Sprite: a different drone by toomuchtodo on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @05:30PM (#9573292)
Definitely feasible if your mothership is a dirigible using gas turbines to power itself, using laser spotbeams to target drones below for providing remote power.
Re:Sprite: a different drone by lambda on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @03:43PM (#9572613)
Yes, another approach is to not have to carry all of the energy with you. Solar charging is another possibility.
Re:Sprite: a different drone by chinpokomon on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @04:32PM (#9572938)
I don't know that the energy density of solar cells work for their weight. Electric motors require a pretty high current. Even if you are supplementing another power source, I think you'll still be losing more than you are gaining for that application. You are probably fine with fixed wing, but multicopter designs will draw significantly more power.
Re:Sprite: a different drone by cellularmitosis on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @05:41PM (#9573359)
I'd assume he's referring to having solar charging stations at the way-points.