News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fixing Engineering's Loyalty and Longevity Problem by eabraham on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @01:16PM (#9571614)
"Your goal, as a hiring manager, is to find the people who want to invest in their careers, who are aiming for mastery and not just looking to make more money or build a shiny resume."

Why are these two concepts mutually exclusive? Experience, money, and mastery are just a few of the side effects of a successful career.

Re:Fixing Engineering's Loyalty and Longevity Problem by tomjen3 on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @01:58PM (#9571912)
Yeah, that made me see red. Just money? Money is food in my mouth, money is attention from a qualified doctor in a good hospital when I get ill, money is a good place to live in a nice and safe area, with heating that turns on in the winter, money is a car that starts when you turn the key, with a tank full of gas. Money is fucking important.
Re:Fixing Engineering's Loyalty and Longevity Problem by Eridrus on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @02:20PM (#9578137)
In the context of software engineering in silicon valley, money isn't the difference between being able to afford a car that starts or not, it's mostly about how much money you have sloshing around in a rainy day fund.
Re:Fixing Engineering's Loyalty and Longevity Problem by tomjen3 on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @03:16PM (#9578521)
Okay lets change it then: more money is how long you can do without a job and still have all those things.
Re:Fixing Engineering's Loyalty and Longevity Problem by MadManE on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @01:37PM (#9571769)
I think the point is that people who are looking exclusively for money or shine will make poor employees. If someone is looking to be a master, the others will naturally follow.