News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Domain-Specific Languages vs. Notation by dozzie on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @10:07AM (#9570110)
Yes, it's pretty common to call it that. Mainly because it's pretty common for programmers to be undereducated, so they misapply terms or unnecessarily reinvent terminology.

Let's call the "smart interface with domain-specific verbs" a domain-specific interface, it would be just fine. But calling it a language is simply a term abuse.

Re:Domain-Specific Languages vs. Notation by tel on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @10:13AM (#9570156)
Before you start throwing insults, what exactly is a language to you? I'm pretty confident that determining the difference between a language and an API is not so easy a thing to do.
Re:Domain-Specific Languages vs. Notation by dragonwriter on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @10:14AM (#9570169)
A language has syntax and semantics; the combination of domain specific semantics with general purpose syntax is a domain-specific language.

Of course, with host languages that support user-defined syntax rules, an internal DSL may also have specialized syntax.

The cumbersome term you invented is not an accurate replacement for internal DSL.

Re:Domain-Specific Languages vs. Notation by kenbellows on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @11:02AM (#9570539)
> it's pretty common for programmers to be undereducated...

[citation needed]

Re:Domain-Specific Languages vs. Notation by moron4hire on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @12:56PM (#9571484)
Not that I think it's an adequate citation, but there is an essay from Dijkstra on the front page of HN right now where he says essentially the same thing: https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD06xx/E...
Re:Domain-Specific Languages vs. Notation by Dewie3 on Tuesday May 19, 2015 @10:35AM (#9570318)
I've seen the distinction between internal and external DSL in academia as well.