Re:Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath
by dunstad on Saturday November 21, 2009 @09:24PM
(#955292)
I don't think he should've used the word sociopath. It already has a popularly accepted definition, and the concept that he's trying to represent doesn't fit well with it. If you want to read about real sociopaths, go somewhere else.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
You might be right, although author responds that concern with considerable detail here:
But let’s step back here. I am using the word in its
everyday, loosely overloaded sense. As in, you telling
your friend, “you are such a !@##$ sociopath.” I want to
stick to the term for two good reasons. One: Hugh
Macleod’s original cartoon which inspired this series is
too good to give up. Second, distrust of communities and
groups, and a stubborn individualism, are the main
personality characteristics here (and this position is
not original to me; it is derived from William Whyte).
Words like “player” or “enlightened” (two suggested
alternatives) don’t cut it.
http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/11/21/morality-compassion-and...
Re:Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath
by roryokane on Saturday November 21, 2009 @09:34PM
(#955301)
What word do you think he should have used instead?
Re:Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath
by dunstad on Saturday November 21, 2009 @09:54PM
(#955325)
He could have made one up, or portmanteau-ed something. That's what language is supposed to do when it fails to describe a concept.
Re:Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath
by barry-cotter on Sunday November 22, 2009 @12:50AM
(#955456)
Player. Losers would be spectators, clueless pawns.