News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath by dunstad on Saturday November 21, 2009 @09:24PM (#955292)
I don't think he should've used the word sociopath. It already has a popularly accepted definition, and the concept that he's trying to represent doesn't fit well with it. If you want to read about real sociopaths, go somewhere else.
Re:Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath by nkurz on Sunday November 22, 2009 @02:08PM (#956049)
You might be right, although author responds that concern with considerable detail here:

  But let’s step back here. I am using the word in its 
  everyday, loosely overloaded sense.  As in, you telling 
  your friend, “you are such a !@##$ sociopath.”  I want to 
  stick to the term for two good reasons. One: Hugh 
  Macleod’s original cartoon which inspired this series is 
  too good to give up. Second, distrust of communities and 
  groups, and a stubborn individualism, are the main 
  personality characteristics here (and this position is 
  not original to me; it is derived from William Whyte). 
  Words like “player” or “enlightened” (two suggested 
  alternatives) don’t cut it. 

http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/11/21/morality-compassion-and...
Re:Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath by roryokane on Saturday November 21, 2009 @09:34PM (#955301)
What word do you think he should have used instead?
Re:Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath by dunstad on Saturday November 21, 2009 @09:54PM (#955325)
He could have made one up, or portmanteau-ed something. That's what language is supposed to do when it fails to describe a concept.
Re:Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath by barry-cotter on Sunday November 22, 2009 @12:50AM (#955456)
Player. Losers would be spectators, clueless pawns.
Re:Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath by hnhg on Sunday November 22, 2009 @06:00AM (#955631)
It's simply a bad take on Nietzsche's ubermensch. As someone pointed out he even uses the phrase 'will-to-power'.