News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Awesome SQL blog. Parent comment

Re:Awesome SQL blog by leandrod on Saturday November 21, 2009 @09:02PM (#955270)
Ðat may be true, but what platforms do internally ſhould not affect ðeir flavours of SQL.

In oðer words, internal implementation as ſets do not make SQL ſet‐baſed.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Awesome SQL blog by pradocchia on Sunday November 22, 2009 @12:50AM (#955455)
No argument there (ðere?), SQL is an unfortunate language.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Awesome SQL blog by cturner on Sunday November 22, 2009 @06:49AM (#955660)
Do you have any thoughts about why there has been no challenge to the SQL syntax? We can easily imagine notations based on relational algebra and relational calculus emerging that could be interpreted at the same levels of an RDBMS as SQL, yet I've not seen anyone attempt it. A good PhD topic for someone?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Awesome SQL blog by encoderer on Sunday November 22, 2009 @09:32AM (#955756)
SQL was designed to make data accessible to non-programmers. That's why it lacks more advanced/obscure syntax.

And the reason why it's stuck is the same story that you can tell over and over about standards.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Awesome SQL blog by shaunxcode on Sunday November 22, 2009 @01:41PM (#956022)
APL? (seriously)
[ Parent | on HN ]