Re:Against the definition of types
by AnimalMuppet on Thursday May 14, 2015 @05:18PM
(#9547635)
No. There may be some magic formal definition that would work between contexts. Until we have such a definition, though, he says it's better (at least between contexts) to work off of an informal, inexact definition, and to be aware that you are doing so.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.