Re:Ask HN: Why don't websites have 'text only' backup versions?
by a3n on Thursday May 14, 2015 @08:34AM
(#9544719)
Among my small circle that used to be the habit when sharing links, share the print link. News sites used to have it a lot, but I don't see it so much anymore.
Re:Ask HN: Why don't websites have 'text only' backup versions?
by bryanlarsen on Thursday May 14, 2015 @10:03AM
(#9545187)
print links generally don't use the print media css. Usage of print media css means the site prints something different than is what is seen on the screen.
Re:Ask HN: Why don't websites have 'text only' backup versions?
by AdrianRossouw on Thursday May 14, 2015 @09:05AM
(#9544871)
print stylesheets can be a real pain in the ass to test properly.
at least before chrome web-inspector got the handy checkbox.
EDIT: A bit of online searching mainly shows people *complaining8 about print sheets, so perhaps I'm completely out of the loop and simply haven't printed anything in a long time.
It's not much - just stripping out menu bars and other stuff that makes no sense in print, plus a few typographical changes, such as a change in font from sans serif (screen) to serif (paper).
Similar to the other comment, there isn't a clear business case for it very often, but whenever there's a website with a "print version"-link to their articles I don't see why they wouldn't do this instead. Well, aside from the fact that nobody would expect this functionality to be there, which isn't minor I guess.
[0] http://alistapart.com/article/goingtoprint