Re:How I found glaring errors in Einstein's calculations (2009)
by dalke on Thursday May 14, 2015 @05:59AM
(#9544199)
Grr! Then at least start your first comment with "I haven't read the article, but based on keyword matching in the title I want to say .." or something like that.
There's no reason to repeatedly point out that Einstein's theories are flawless. The article specifically says "To most physicists, such discussions are largely irrelevant, as these classic experiments were only the first ones in a long series of tests that showed the complete agreement between observations and predictions from special relativity."
There's no reason to repeatedly point out that Einstein's theories are flawless. The article specifically says "To most physicists, such discussions are largely irrelevant, as these classic experiments were only the first ones in a long series of tests that showed the complete agreement between observations and predictions from special relativity."
See also http://www.phdcomics.com/comics.php?f=1632 .