Re:The Wolfram Language Image Identification Project
by jgalt212 on Thursday May 14, 2015 @09:15AM
(#9544949)
While not applicable for this post, I really like:
> (5) does not adequately acknowledge his predecessors
as a huge indicator of PR-driven news article rather than a news-driven news article.
TL;DR [quote] Although it is clear that Wolfram is no crank, not someone skeptics would label a pseudoscientist, skeptics will notice that, despite his flawless credentials, staggering intelligence, and depth of knowledge, Wolfram possesses many attributes of a pseudoscientist: (1) he makes grandiose claims, (2) works in isolation, (3) did not go through the normal peer-review process, (4) published his own book, (5) does not adequately acknowledge his predecessors, and (6) rejects a well-established theory of at least one famous scientist. [/quote]