News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Santa Monica council votes 7-0 to crack down on Airbnb by majormajor on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @01:50PM (#9540677)
Hundreds of additional units potentially being opened up for traditional rentals certainly sounds like a good thing for rapidly-rising Santa Monica rents.

Pulling up AirBNB listings for a random week a few months from now in SM also makes it look like most of the stuff being listed is small apartments/houses, not the swanky giant houses that would be well outside the market of the typical renter who's currently being squeezed. However, it's unclear from a cursory look how many units were permanent rentals versus "I travel on business a lot so I can have guests stay when I'm not here" type stuff which is much more reasonable.[1]

There's a fair bit of new residential construction going on, but it doesn't seem like enough yet, and I think a city—especially one that already has an easily-healthy number of tourists/visitors—has more responsibility to residents regarding rent than to visitors who are experiencing a likewise-overheated hotel market.

[1] although it's not a pleasant thought to think that for many people, things are tight enough that the money made from renting out their place (and the risks that go with it) when not home is a significant boon to their life.

Re:Santa Monica council votes 7-0 to crack down on Airbnb by eonw on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @06:45PM (#9542471)
SM also has strong rent rules, a smart building owner would rather AirBNB their available space as they can charge more for it and aren't locked in for X number of years if the tenant doesn't move.

A good friend lives in a nice building in SM, the owner wont fix one of the elevators because he is trying to push the seniors out that pay less then 50% of the current market value, so he can raise rent.