If so, don't you think that is what he would have written?
There are enough differences over what can be good quality that teams can be bogged down over discussions that just have no good answer and these take a lot of brain power.
There are enough differences over what can be good quality that teams can be bogged down over discussions that just have no good answer and these take a lot of brain power.
So the code is written with higher quality up front? Sounds like reviews are working as intended.