News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CλaSH – From Haskell to Hardware by raverbashing on Saturday May 09, 2015 @12:22PM (#9516787)
> I'm actually generating nice Verilog specifications. Can I apply it somehow if I'm not working in Intel or something? What can I do with it?

Throw it into an FPGA

Re:CλaSH – From Haskell to Hardware by krick on Saturday May 09, 2015 @12:26PM (#9516804)
And it would be significantly faster than if I would concentrate on optimizing the code for, say, executing it on GPU?
Re:CλaSH – From Haskell to Hardware by CHY872 on Saturday May 09, 2015 @12:50PM (#9516891)
Perhaps. Perhaps not. If you have an algorithm that is better implemented in hardware, you might well see better performance executing it on a GPU (for example, if you want to mine bitcoins).

Really, FPGAs are meant for prototyping hardware; you synthesize your ASIC onto the FPGA and check it for functionality.

Of course, there's a reason you're making that ASIC.

Re:CλaSH – From Haskell to Hardware by raverbashing on Saturday May 09, 2015 @01:02PM (#9516919)
Or you don't do an ASIC and ship the FPGA. That's common as well (for the big manufacturers it's cheaper to do an ASIC, for the not so big, it's more common to sell the FPGA)
Re:CλaSH – From Haskell to Hardware by raverbashing on Saturday May 09, 2015 @12:41PM (#9516855)
Depends on what you want to do.

It's not about faster, it's about the application, you can't plug a PC with a GPU to solve all problems.

FPGAs weren't created for bitcoin mining.