Re:Why functional programming matters (1990) [pdf]
by lmm on Thursday May 07, 2015 @11:33AM
(#9505790)
If "prover" just means "has dependent types" then that's a much larger class than it sounds like. I write a lot of Scala, which has dependent types, but most of the code I write is just ordinary web services.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why functional programming matters (1990) [pdf]
by mafribe on Friday May 08, 2015 @01:44AM
(#9510158)
I meant dependent types a la Agda, Coq etc that you can use for proving essentially arbitrary properties. Scala and Haskell do not have this.