News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Dawn of AI: How to ensure the promise outweighs the p... by bwood on Thursday May 07, 2015 @11:28AM (#9505750)
If the AI doesn't have its own intention (perhaps having intention is a prerequisite for being truly intelligent), it's conceivable that we would program it with an intention or goal, such "find the most efficient way to produce as many paperclips as possible". If you assigned such a task to a human, it's fairly obvious that the task is subject to other things which are important to humans (for example, don't enslave or kill people to build paperclips, don't replace strip-mine all our farmland to find more paperclip material, etc.). But since an AI doesn't necessarily share, understand, or agree with all the implicit values we have, it's myopic view of the world could cause it to destroy us as a mere side-effect of trying to achieve it's singular goal.
Re:The Dawn of AI: How to ensure the promise outweighs the p... by return0 on Thursday May 07, 2015 @11:42AM (#9505858)
yeah but that's bad design or terrorism, there is always another person to blame here. I think we are talking here about machines that take the blame themselves.
Re:The Dawn of AI: How to ensure the promise outweighs the p... by DanAndersen on Thursday May 07, 2015 @12:29PM (#9506279)
I'm not sure what the purpose is of focusing on blame. You don't need to assign moral culpability to a machine for its catastrophically poor design to be something to worry about.