News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Racking Mac Pros by MCRed on Wednesday May 06, 2015 @08:27PM (#9502650)
No, they wouldn't.

Look at the current state of Mackintoshes. People are having kernel panics and struggling to keep their machines running with current software. OS X moves pretty fast, possibly faster than Linux, and Apple builds it to support Mac hardware.... the teams who are porting hackintosh code have to support a lot more hardware variety and they have less resources than, say, linux.

Running mackintoshes in production makes no sense.

And I challenge the claim that you would save money.

Looking just at off the shelf costs of low end hardware does not tell you the TCO of serious machines that need to be running all the time.

To get comparable hardware quality to Apple products you have to spend more, generally, when going with "commodity" hardware.

The idea that Apple is expensive is a myth, born of two things-- people perpetuating it since 1980 (yes, 35 years this myth has been spread), with the vested interest of rationalizing their dislike of Apple... and the fact that Apple doesn't compete at the very low end.

In production, TCO is much more about reliability and other things than initial hardware cost.

Re:Racking Mac Pros by mauricemir on Thursday May 07, 2015 @05:04AM (#9503915)
You mean the professional market that that Apple is abandoning in favor of consumer devices.

I look after a mostly MAC environment and OX server is hopeless no migration from stand alone MAC's to Networked was the first shocker I found

And our Mac's are less stable than our windows 8 Box used for running hyperv VM's

Re:Racking Mac Pros by rbanffy on Wednesday May 06, 2015 @09:48PM (#9502894)
> People are having kernel panics and struggling to keep their machines running with current software.

Not here. My Mac is at about 11 days of uptime and it's under constant use. At this moment, I can't say it's less reliable then my Linux machines.

In this specific case, however, I'd consider ditching the enclosure and ducting cold air through the internal chassis/heatsink. A Macpro is, essentially a heatsink with boards mounted on it and I'd just let the chassis do that part.

Re:Racking Mac Pros by danielsamuels on Thursday May 07, 2015 @04:28AM (#9503855)
Is 11 days of uptime supposed to be impressive?
Re:Racking Mac Pros by rbanffy on Thursday May 07, 2015 @06:41AM (#9504110)
It's hardly the uptime of someone who's struggling with kernel panics and random crashes. Last power down was when I embarked on a trip. The previous one was a system update. In fact, I never saw a kernel panic with this machine.
Re:Racking Mac Pros by prirun on Saturday May 09, 2015 @11:29AM (#9516642)
Here's my 10.6.8 Snow Leopard MacBook Pro laptop:

sh-3.2# uptime 11:28 up 117 days, 19:13, 4 users, load averages: 0.91 0.98 0.95

Re:Racking Mac Pros by kibibu on Thursday May 07, 2015 @12:30AM (#9503289)
I think the part you quoted was referring to hackintosh machines only.

Still, there's no doubt in my mind that Apple are doing some "move fast and break things" OS development.

Re:Racking Mac Pros by rbanffy on Thursday May 07, 2015 @01:31PM (#9506773)
One really shouldn't blame Apple for OSX not working on a Hackintosh.
Re:Racking Mac Pros by donut2d on Wednesday May 06, 2015 @11:35PM (#9503144)
> People are having kernel panics and struggling to keep their machines running with current software.

A guy I work with has been running several heavily used hackintosh servers without issue. They have been very reliable and he's happily converted existing Linux servers to hackintosh. He's been doing this for a while and knows exactly what hardware to use.